From what I know about Big-Pharma, I feel certain that they had something to do with your car problems. They do have mercenaries in their employ, as well as governments.
It also sounds to me like you are being protected by some benevolent beings. (:

I have not seen your vaccine video, but am looking forward to seeing it.

When my grandson was diagnosed the first time, by his teachers, with autism, I was already aware of the criminality of Big-Pharma, and made it my business to find out how and why the vaccines resulted in autism. After getting that information under my belt, my grandson was blood tested for heavy metals, and the result was high levels of mercury, other toxic metals and 3 times the average level of aluminum. The aluminum level of 3 times average alone indicates autism.

All of these toxic metals, in the levels found in the vaccines adjuvants given to young children used to be considered illegal given to grown men.

Furthermore, I have since found out that non-ionizing radiation (alternation currency) in the specific range that our bodies operate on (direct currency) can cause these toxic metals to leach out of our bodies and pass the blood-brain barrier. These toxic high-frequency currencies also turn off the immune system, causing all or almost all diseases to increase exponentially.

My grandson is much better now. I see no effects of the autism anymore. While autistic his teachers were amazed at his artistic abilities. Thankfully, that part of the autism has not changed.

Again, I really am looking forward to the autism videos. I have come across a lot of people who should know better who have been scared into taking the H1N1 vaccine. I am looking forward to seeing your video on that also.

Thank you, Aajonus, for being in “service to others” as you have been all your life.

Absolutely no offense whatever is intended, but for the benefit of otherwise new and uninitiated PD subscribers, the fol alternatives for the term “pus” are respectfully offered , re: “pus” = purulence; purulent fluids; p. exudate, etc.

Since “laws” were mentioned by you in this newsletter, (and since I am a new member and don’t know my way around this website,) I thought this is as good a place as any to leave a my suggestion to you regarding you finding legal remedy for the farm cooperative which I heard was recently shut down and other problems that governmental bodies seem to love to place on you.

My suggestion is that you look into Maritime Law and Uniform Commercial Code, which both I think, but for sure Maritime, does not recognize the authority of those governmental bodies created by “statute” over you. I am new to learning about this.

However, there is a growing group of activists that are studying these things and kicking ass in courts in ways that that was previously unthinkable. Mostly this is coming from the right, gun-toting activists, and mostly for monetary gain. But I suggest that other types of activists, like Occupy, are learning how to use these laws. And good on them!

There are certain ways to approach the problem with the FDA(?) or any other governmental agency where they and their statutes would have no power over you in court. In fact you could make them pay you for as much money as you wished for the harm they have done to you by using contract law by going into court as a human being and not the fiction (corporation) that was printed on your birth certificate. That’s a long story that I suggest you might do well to look into.

Love,

Susan

Physiological development does not exclude neuro-physiology and such amazing developments as the neurological capacity to hear sounds (and even read letters) and then to form symbolic sequences in to meaningful language. On this planet, one of the most unusual “technologies” is language. Creatures without language (or with only rudimentary language, such as infants), could not understand this sentence, even if it were translated in to their native language. The vocabulary I have used is already far too advanced for most infants, who would not recognize terms like functionality or neuro-physiology or even “other foreign languages.”

Now, why would I take the time to state all of those obvious facts? I was setting up an analogy.

Imagine now that I am planning to go to speak to an infant that has only rudimentary language development. Further, imagine that the infant is in a state of whatever severe medical diagnosis we might add: autistic, full of various toxins, eating a diet heavy in refined grains (cooked- obviously) and modern fried oils from grain seeds like soy and corn, plus maybe they were a “crack baby” who was born premature, underweight, and undernourished and is only alive because of a bunch of expensive medical interventions. In other words, they are at least “a little slow.”

Now, imagine that I want to explain to this infant why raw milk is so wonderful and why governments can be so, um, autistic and why the word organic is actually just a linguistic code such that when different people use that code, they actually might functionally mean “mostly organic, like around 85%.” It’s like if I have a shirt that is 85% red and I refer to the shirt as red, most people will understand that I am talking about the 85% of the shirt that is red even though there is another 15% that is not- maybe the fabric is red but there is some embroidery or graphic design screen-printed over the red, right?

So, we have here an infant that is, for sake of argument, approximately 85% intelligent, according to whatever standards we might use. The infant also has a slight hearing problem, so it properly hears about 85% of the sounds I say and then mistakes the other 15% of the sounds that I make as sounds that I actually did not make. Plus, I have a thick accent and I use a lot of unusual ideas and unusual terminology.

So, now I am ready to tell this infant how raw milk is wonderful and some other things like how mitochondria are not only good bacteria, but the absolute very best. I may even make a lot of references that are completely contrary to the infant’s current MODELS OF REALITY, right?

First, the infant may not be especially interested in the subject at all, right? Then, they are these huge issues regarding the actual communication.

Ok, so that is a metaphor about a jury (or registered voters). If you want to go to trial (or ballot)about raw milk, be cognizant of the reality of the jury that would be there.

That is also a metaphor about the mainstream media. Some people may have an attraction to widespread fame and the stated appreciation from the CDC, and from CNN, and so on. It is natural enough to want validation and respect and admiration, right?

However, there is also the matter of priorities. When I suddenly lost the ability to walk at age 36, it was not a priority to me to get fame or to educate others. I obtained a pint of raw cream (produced by grass-fed cows) and I consumed it one evening and could walk the next morning. It cost me about $4.50.

Did I break any laws to get it? I really did not care and I really do not care. I would not want to be charged with a crime of course, but my point is that if it were a violation of any law or regulation, I would have no guilt or shame about it. I might maintain my privacy (secrecy) about the details, but not from guilt or shame- only from the modesty of a practical preference to avoid complications involving any court system.

So, my perspective is that the CDC may be one of many operations which REGULATE the health of the US population, “intentionally or otherwise.” Again, the CDC may be rather like a bunch of autistic infants.

What I mean by regulate is that the CDC discourages extremes, promotes uniformity. They MIGHT take actions that improve the health (or at least delay the deaths) or various portions of the population. They also “MIGHT” take actions that reduce the health of the healthiest portions of the general public.

But so what? We might pause here to review a functional definition of government and consider what priorities we might have available as options of how we relate to governments.

Governments govern. That is what they do.

They all systematically redistribute wealth. They punish certain things (such as by taxation) and they reward certain things.

They all use organized violence (like armies and squads of law enforcement officers). Organized violence is how they GOVERN the systematic redistribution of wealth.

That is the nature of their business, right?
So, how might I choose to relate to governments?

This gets back to the issue of neuro-LINGUISTIC development, like what do I say about this: what do governments have to do with me recovering the ability to walk? Not much? Only a little?

Let’s say that governments were relatively irrelevant to me getting that pint of raw cream and recovering the ability to walk. Maybe they helped in 402 ways (building roads and so on) and harmed in 372 ways (collecting taxes to build the roads). I’ll leave those computations to people more interested in the computations.

So, it is natural for me to value the respect and admiration of others, right? Well, I can also empathize with the employees of the CDC in that regard- like their valuing of respect and admiration. They do not want to be humiliated or ashamed, right? In the case of a racketeering scheme, the beneficiaries of the scheme do not want publicity that would interfere with or even threaten the very existence of their scheme, right?

They are just operating a business (called “the government”) and they want to keep the inequitable economic redistribution flowing toward them, right? They do not want any interference with their organized coercion “protection rackets,” right? They may not want competition, right- like they may want to discourage other protection rackets of organized violence by criminalizing any “unauthorized” protection rackets of organized violence, right?

So, what if I was not ashamed or guilty in general? What if I was not reactively afraid of governments, but also was respectful of their vast military potency? Would I shame them? Would I crave their validation and respect from the perspective of a whining pesky outrage?

Or would my priority be to value maintaining a dynamic of minimal cooperation (or even maximum privacy)? I might not want to “DEFEAT” or “REFORM” the government because I might not want to enter their jurisdiction at all.

What do I mean by “jurisdiction?” Their jurisdiction is the defining of words. That is what courts and statutes do: they create and reform the “legal” definitions of words. They define what is legal and how.

They are the functional masters in the art of language. It may be practically valuable for me to understand and respect that.

Now, if I want to “go to war” with the commercial interests of the USDA and the AMA (etc) over the court-room definitions of words like “organic,” that is a matter of great importance to those commercial interests. Consider a term like “Kosher” which is am entirely distinct linguistic category from “Organic.”

If breast-feeding was defined as a ritual sacrament (conducted in private), would courts interfere with it? If consuming the fresh raw milk of humans by infants can be a protected ritual sacrament, then what about the consuming of various others things- could those be a sacrament?

People have sacraments to eat Eucharist wafers and unleavened bread (at passover?). Yesterday, I had some “high fish” (fish that is very high in bacteria and produces a variety of results including one that is similar to drinking fermented fruit juices such as wine). Eating something like that involves a ritual. Why not openly use terminology (symbolic CODES called words!) that are not within the jurisdiction that courts have defined for themselves? Why argue with them over their use of words? Why not just use other words?

I invite you to RESPECT organizations like the Jesuits and Freemasons and the branches of their tree,” by which I mean central governments like the US and the EU. If you do not understand the detail of what I just said, I will rephrase like this: how about *respecting* the functional authority (and potential for intense violence) of the UN/US/USA and it’s branches: such as the USDA, the USDC (court system), the DOJ, and the CDC?